Just say NO to : Non-mutually agreed upon, "after the fact", forced spanking and paddling.
.
To live in a LAND where there is NOT a LAW against one person doing RAPEFUL-SPANKING(where either of the ones ACTUALLY ENGAGED in "giving and receiving" do not each mutually consent) to another, is something that disheartens me. There needs to be a LAW AGAINST THIS. Parents do not have the right to do this rapeful-SPANKING TO a CHILD for punishment, just as they do not have the right to TOUCH other PRIVATE PARTS of the child for punishment. Such actions are INAPPROPRIATE..
When used as a form of "after the fact" forced-PUNISHMENT ~ it is either "sexual" or it is "violent".
.
Spanking is generally speaking ~ a sexual thing; it's something which is to be consensually conducted between lovers/sexual-partners/administrators who mutually choose such.(of course there are different degrees of PRESSURE/force that a person may want/desire)
.
When I say "spanking" we consider Paddling as well. The paddle is merely an EXTENSION of the hand.
.
The "rear-end" is by in part SEXUAL and anybody who knows, knows this.
.
It is EXTREMELY VIOLATING to have someone hit you UNCONSENSUALLY(when you do not want it). Especially when it is PERVERTEDLY-SEXUAL, it also is horrible when it is to the VIOLENT side, as well..
I went to a school with PADDLES on the wall or in the closet ~ and the THREATS of such were upon the child. It was a FEARFUL time for me and presumably for other children as well, it was "perverted". For me as a male, it usually left me feeling "SEXUALIZED" towards the FEMALE-TEACHERS and "dirty-gay"(although at that young and tender age I did not know that, that is what it was) by/towards the MALE TEACHERS..
I hope that PEOPLE of all ages can swiftly come to terms with this entire thing. I am really SICKENED by in part over this issue... I pray for liberation ~ for all..
Forced spanking/paddling IS WRONG when it is DONE "AFTER the fact" of the incident of VIOLENCE. In order to "break up violence"(DURING THE ACT of violence) in the name of defense ~ it is sort of like saying "force to the extent necessary.".
IN THE NAME OF DEFENSE, during the act of breaking up a VIOLENT INCIDENT where it would be acceptable to do such "spankings/paddling" in a FORCEFUL-MANNER, we have to ask :"Is this really realistic?" Meaning, would it really stop the violence? ~ Would a TAZER or TRANQUILIZER-GUN or NET-GUN, a blanket or something like that maybe be better if there really is that much VIOLENCE going on in that "PARTICULAR -WORLD"? IDEALLY You kind of want BIGGER guys as "POLICE" to GRAB the violent one off of the INNOCENT one, and seclude the VIOLENT individual as a first line of defense. In other tragic notes, sometimes you have to use DEADLY FORCE against a child if the child is BEING VIOLENT to another and that is the only way you can stop the VIOLENT CHILD.
.
Usually the actual mechanism/mode that is the working function behind such action for which those who claim spanking/paddling is an appropriate means to "punish" or keep a child from "doing it again" is in fact the SEXUAL CONNECTION.
It is something which can corruptingly PERVERT the child.
When done "after the fact" and outside of mutually agreed upon relations by those directly involved ~ It is a form of RAPE ~ a fondle of the private part.
.
THE SPANKING of CHILDREN by adults is a PROBLEM
A child should have a basic set of rights once that BABY is in life and free from the "mother's" BODY.The way some people who are labeled "adults"(and sometimes "parents") are thinking about those labeled as "children" with respect to how children are nurtured and cared for and taught to live is "off key/base" from where it could be, or moreover where it should be.
I think by in part it has to do with how people/parents feel about themselves. Somtimes it has to do with how the parent was/is treated by others. Perhaps sometimes the parent is under the influence of things.(a variety)
There are potentially people out there who think about HITTING kids before the kids are ever born into existence, that's twisted. Those people are MESSED up, just like human SLAVE-OWNERS were messed up.
----
IN cases where one is violent and they must be dealt with, you may have to IMPRISON/seclude them, and nurture/rehabilitate the individual... you should not pervertedly hit the individual or do any other rapeful thing to them.The "spanking of children" as an "after the fact" form of punishment is wrong.
----
CONSIDER THIS SITUATION: If we are working to bring children OUT OF POVERTY we do not want to bring them into situations where they are going to be PERVERTEDLY HIT OUT or otherwise MISTREATED due to RAPEFUL GOVERNMENT POLICY. Let us rise and change things today.
The gov't(and it's police-forces/armies) should be protecting the kids, not allowing kids to be "pervertedly hit out" by turning a blind eye or in some cases by FULL OUT SANCTIONING IT. What a tragic situation.
----
"THE MONEY SHOT":INNOCENSE LOST
Having paddles and SPANKING stuff going on around children is just like having any other type of SEXUAL stuff around children.
It is NOT necessarilly going to be good for the child's development.
From what the WISE-ONES tried to tell me: PADDLES belong in the ADULT world, with the condoms and the dildos.(Please pardon me, forgive me in other words ~ if there is better or more "couth" terms/phrases in place of these words, I lack the knowledge)
Some people may be afraid of paddles or condoms or dildos as they had their innocent pleasure RUINED in that aspect of exposure in a THREATENING TYPE WAY... they hopefully have the ability to heal over time. As a child, if you are threatened with condoms or dildos you are perhaps going to grow to be afraid of such.
For me it was a TURN OFF to see a man with the action(paddle) threatening me, it was I guess what would be termed a "gay like feeling"(NOT the happy type gay) ~ it was a major turn off to me in this life. The women who threatened me, well it was an EROTIC jesture and it was arousing ~ I do not know if that is good, to have that around kids like that.
I wonder if it sort of artifically created a SYSTEM of "induction" in a way associated with my "positionment" (there is more to say on this).
The THREAT FROM THE ADMINISTRATION should have been something like "seclusion/prison/reform school"(expulsion) if there needed to be a threat against VIOLENCE or what have you.
At school ... say you were an INNOCENT KID who was merely defending yourself when another VIOLENT KID attacked you. However, due to the policy of the school anybody caught fighting was to be PADDLED-OUT, that's not right. To be clear it is wrong to HIT OUT even the "violent kid" ~ "after the fact"(of the incident/fight).
Obviously, in the line of duty, in order to BREAK up the fight and such, the POLICE/authorities would have the right to use force, however, as said "after the fact of the occurence" it is not right.
IN order to break up a fight I really do not think "BEATING a KID on the rear" is going to stop a SERIOUS FIGHTER, you would have to use force in the manner of PULLING the PERPETRATOR off or otherwise HAVE MORE ADVANCED STUNNING AGENTS like TAZERS or TRANQUILIZERS.
And for all those people who say DOING THIS BEATING STUFF TO KIDS is appropriate to "curb violence", let me tell you, that in many cases ~ it will only make the PERPETRATOR more mad and the perpetrator USUALLY STRIKEs BACK, maybe when you least expect it ~ and the only way to stop a violent person you'd see would be to IMPRISON them... so you see, by logic, you'd have been better off to simply IMPRISON THEM in the first place and nurture reform them from that angle, you wasted all those years FONDLING them when you could have been HAVING nice spanking relations with your "lover" instead of doing the misguided action you as the TEACHER were doing to a "youngster".
What do you do about KIDS who are willing to take a BEATING so they can stay with their parents? Rather than perhaps go to a LESS than "comfortable" orphanage or foster parents who are not as seemingly desireable to the child? Well first, I think it is about making a better ORPHANAGE SYSTEM and having such well funded so that kids realize they have OTHER OPTIONS... nice house mothers and fathers with kind caring nurturting care... VOLUNTEERS ETC...
Would/should society allow KIDS to stay with parents who FONDLE THE PENIS or the BREASTS?(kids who want to stay with such parents) It is the same thing with SPANKING on the BOTTOM. What about kids who are willing to take "CHILD PORN EVENTS", rather than leave their parents? Some parents may even go as far as to buy kids TOYS and CANDY to keep them "lured" into the SPANKING SESSIONS...
For perspective: I have said it before and I will say it again ~ if I had to make a decision between having someone RAPEFULLY TAKE a PICTURE of my rear-end or "touch" my rear-end I would rather have them take a PICTURE and keep their hands off me in that way. Obviously, I would rather not have to choose either.(Speaking from the perspective of : if I was forced to choose one or the other though...) So why is there a LAW against the ONE form(picture) which is LESS INVASIVE than the other more invasive?(bottom fondling)
--------
To be VERY CLEAR: I do not want people to think that there is anything wrong with "MUTUALLY agreed upon-SPANKINGS and PADDLINGS" between ADULTS.(such can be very wonderful and pleasant/fanciful between lovers, just like any other sexual relation) ~ Usually people like it on the nice and light side in some cases a nice smacking... it is really up to the people ENGAGED in such.
If children were engaging in this, it most likely had to do with the notion of being "jived up" by being around such, aroused or what have you... normally KIDS should NOT be around that stuff...
I would perhaps one day like to discuss this STUFF with the teachers who did the threats against me, if they are still alive, and with HONESTY in the APPROACH. I think to safely/correctly do this: SOCIETY/government is really going to have to APOLOGIZE and make REPARATIONS to the kids who were actually HIT OUT.(more to say on this) Many of the teachers were other-wise nice people, somehow misguided in this REFERENCED-FUNCTION, similar perhaps to how I was misguided to "drink/smoke and drive"(I followed other adults I saw doing it when I was a child).
I am a SENSITIVE PERSON and I feel I was HARMED by what happened to me, there are people who want to "brush it under the rug" as it was nothing... I find such GROSS and DISGUSTING of them...
-----
KIDs who were actually hit out "AFTER the fact" by the government should be paid back. Kids who were hit out after the fact by parents should have the right to SUE the parent for damages; if a settlement could not be reached..
HOPE IN CHANGEs
----------------------------
Behind the Scenes
This is an embarrassing topic, however if we do not address/face the issue we will not be able to put an end to rapeful spankings/paddlings.
When discussing this subject ~ I would use the PHRASE "perverted hitting(of a child)" ~ As compared to "spanking". I think the TERM(spanking) is to some extent sexually active in it's tone(as is PADDLE or PADDLING, as the UTENSIL of a sexual relation) and so it goes... Maybe I should have had the site entitled PERVERTED HITTING.(Though, it may not have made the connection.)There is more that can be said, what is in your pantry? And where is your "NUMBER-ONE" consensual LOVER, is he or she getting FONDLED on a PRIVATE-PART in an "non-consensual mutually agreed upon" manner by another?
FORGIVENESS is one thing, if the ones who did "perverted-hittings" to others KNOW that what they did was wrong, what scares me is that there are still seemingly people going around who DO NOT know/comprehend that such is wrong. Or they sit in some sort of denial, not wanting to admit that they were wrong. I hope they can change. I hope there can be a better understanding. Maybe they need to REALLY THINK ABOUT IT ~ perhaps they should have focus groups or something, maybe they will find a CONSENSUAL-PARTNER in such a meeting house ~ you never know...
.
I really think that the way to GET A LAW IN PLACE against this "after the fact" involuntary spanking stuff is to REALLY illustrate the SEXUAL nature of such... for what ever reason certain ADULTS have forgotten the TRUTH at HAND .
For a WHOLESOME FAMILY a "husband and wife" should not be spanking the CHILD/BABE in the midst, they should perhaps be SPANKING each other...
.
Please IGNORE any "non-vegan" advertising. The ads on this page are not affiliated with the writer of these notes above.